geschichte

Êzîdî Politics + Mîr Statements

en5,666 words⏱ approx. 26 min read📚 11 sections🔖 ≥120 sourcesQuality A

8 verified · Wikimedia Commons · CC license

🖼 Images

Status: 2026-05-22 Topics: Mîr system, Êzîdî politicians, Sinjar status, parliamentary recognitions, Daesh tribunals, Yazidi Survivors Law, UN actions, return policy, internal divisions Methodology: Multiply cross-validated via English, German, Kurdish and French sources. Trust score 1–10 per source.


1. The Mîr system (Êzîdî principality)

1.1 History of the Mîr office

The office of Mîr (Kurd. “prince” / Arab. “emir”) is hereditary and is passed from father to son. The Mîr is both the worldly and the spiritual head of the worldwide Êzîdî community; his person is regarded as sacrosanct, and in theory all Êzîdîs owe him spiritual loyalty. The seat of the princely family lies in Bâ’edrê / Ba’adre in the Sheikhan (Şêxan) district, Nineveh Province, northern Iraq.

The present Mîr dynasty claims Umayyad origin and in the 16th/17th century replaced the descendants of Sheikh Hesen (Sheikh Hassan). The worldly power of the family has declined since the late 18th century, but it remains a significant landowner and politically active. A year of 1521 occasionally cited for this change of dynasty is not clearly attested in the standard sources, the Encyclopaedia Iranica broadly dates the transition to the “16th or 17th century”.

Sources (Trust 8–9):

1.2 Current Mîr: Hazim Tahsin Said Beg

  • Born: 1 May 1963 in Ba’adre
  • Took office: 27 July 2019 in the Lalish temple (Şêxan), sworn in by the Êzîdî Supreme Spiritual Council
  • Predecessor: Mîr Tahsîn Saîd Beg (died 28 January 2019 in a clinic in Germany at the age of 85; had been Mîr since 1944, at the age of 11, so 75 years of reign)
  • Selection: chosen from 7 candidates after 6 months of consultations
  • Family: son of Mîr Tahsîn Beg

Sources (Trust 9):

1.3 Controversy around Hazim Tahsin Beg

The election by the spiritual council in Lalish was criticised by parts of the Êzîdî community:

  • Accusation that he was installed by the KDP (Kurdistan Democratic Party), not by the Êzîdî community itself
  • His mother does not come from a princely family, which feeds doubts about his legitimacy
  • In Sinjar (Şingal) there is an opposition faction that does not recognise him as Mîr

Source (Trust 7–8):

1.4 Mîr relations with KRG and Baghdad

Source (Trust 8):

1.5 Vatican meeting (14 November 2024)

Pope Francis received Mîr Hazim Tahsin Beg on 14 November 2024 at the Vatican. The Pope promised: “We will do our best and spare no efforts to assist you”, and committed to pressing the international community to make Iraq enable the return of displaced Êzîdîs.

Source (Trust 9):


2. Êzîdî politicians

2.1 Vian Dakhil: Iraqi parliamentarian

  • Function: only Êzîdî woman in the Iraqi Parliament (since 2010, re-elected 2014, 2018, 2021)
  • Party: Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP)
  • Historic speech: 5 August 2014, emotional appeal in the Iraqi Parliament during the Daesh attack on Sinjar:

“There is a campaign of Genocide being waged on the Yazidi constituent. My people are being slaughtered just as all Iraqis were slaughtered… Away from all political disputes, we want humanitarian solidarity. I speak in the name of humanity. Save us, save us!”

The speech was interrupted by the speaker of parliament; Dakhil collapsed at the lectern. The speech reached President Obama and influenced his decision to authorise US air strikes against Daesh.

  • 12 August 2014: during a relief mission to the Sinjar mountains, an Iraqi rescue helicopter crashed. The pilot died, Dakhil broke her leg.

Sources (Trust 9):

2.2 Khairy/Khairi Bozani: KRG Êzîdî affairs director

  • Function: director for Êzîdî affairs in the KRG Ministry of Religious Endowments (Awqaf), also acts as adviser to the KRG presidency
  • Recent statements (2024–2025):
  • Critical of the al-Hol camp (Syria): no rescue operations since the fall of the Assad regime at the end of 2024
  • Estimates ca. 2,600 missing Êzîdîs, many in the al-Hol camp
  • Warning against the Iraqi general amnesty law: feared release of Sinjar genocide perpetrators
  • Note: only one DNA laboratory in Iraq for the identification of mass-grave victims

Sources (Trust 8):

2.3 Feleknas Uca: German-Turkish politician

  • Born: 17 September 1976 in Celle, Lower Saxony
  • Background: Êzîdî (family immigrated from south-east Turkey)
  • 1999–2009: member of the European Parliament for Die Linke (Germany), at the time the only Êzîdî parliamentarian in the world (until the Iraqi election in 2005)
  • Since 2014: lives in Diyarbakır (Amed), Turkey
  • 2015 (June and November): elected to the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM) for the HDP (Halkların Demokratik Partisi), Diyarbakır province
  • Note: Uca is Êzîdî by birth; occasionally circulating claims to the contrary are factually incorrect.

Sources (Trust 9):

2.4 Êzîdîs in European parliaments

  • Sweden: Lawen Redar (Social Democrats), Kurdish-Êzîdî background
  • Germany: Düzen Tekkal (journalist & activist, not an MdB, but politically very influential), see statement on the Swiss recognition of 17 December 2024
  • Netherlands: several Êzîdî activists lobby in the Tweede Kamer (no elected seat)

3. Sinjar status after 2014

3.1 Sinjar Agreement: 9 October 2020

Signed between the central government in Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) under the auspices of the UN mission UNAMI.

Key points:

  1. Security: withdrawal of all armed groups (YBŞ/PKK, PMU/Hashd, KDP Peshmerga), replacement by a new local police force (~2,500 personnel), recruited primarily from Sinjar
  2. Administration: appointment of an independent mayor for Sinjar (instead of a KDP or PMU loyalist)
  3. Reconstruction: joint coordination of services, infrastructure
  4. IDP return: facilitation of the return of the displaced

3.2 Implementation status (as of 2025/2026)

Largely NOT implemented: five years after signing, none of the central administrative, security or reconstruction provisions are fully implemented.

Obstacles:

  • Dispute over the mayoral nomination
  • PMU/Hashd refuses to withdraw
  • YBŞ has officially become part of the PMU: politically embedded, militarily not
  • Turkish air strikes against YBŞ/PKK structures (most recently documented before July 2024)
  • KDP Peshmerga still partly active

Sources (Trust 9):

3.3 Armed groups in Sinjar (2024–2026)

  • YBŞ (Yekîneyên Berxwedana Şingalê / Sinjar Resistance Units): Êzîdî militia, founded 2007, reorganised by the PKK in 2014; officially part of the PMU/Hashd al-Shaabi. Linked with KCK/PKK.
  • YJÊ: women’s counterpart of the YBŞ
  • Iraqi Army: official forces, often in conflict with the YBŞ
  • PMU/Hashd al-Shaabi: various brigades (Lalish Brigade, 80th Brigade etc.)
  • KDP Peshmerga: reduced presence since the loss of 2017
  • PKK/HPG: directly linked with the YBŞ

Conflict events 2025:

  • March 2025: heavy clashes YBŞ vs. Iraqi Army in Sinjar; 5 YBŞ fighters in custody; 24-hour ultimatum
  • February 2025: PKK founder Abdullah Öcalan called for laying down arms, YBŞ disagrees.

Sources (Trust 8–9):

3.4 International pressure (UN, US, EU)

  • The US State Department and the KRG repeatedly call for implementation
  • USCIRF (United States Commission on International Religious Freedom) reports annually on non-implementation
  • The EU provides reconstruction funds, but ties them to security preconditions

4. Parliamentary recognitions of the Êzîdî genocide: chronologically

Note: “2015 Iraq”, the Iraqi parliamentary resolution recognising the genocide came later (formally 2018–2019 by the Council of Representatives); 2015 was primarily the recognition by the KRG Parliament. The trust rating applies to the dates given.

4.1 Kurdistan Regional Parliament (KRG): 2015

  • First regional recognition; precedes state recognitions

4.2 European Parliament: 4 February 2016

4.3 USA: 14 March 2016 (House) / 17 March 2016 (State Dept.)

  • House Resolution: H.Con.Res.75, initiator Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE)
  • Vote: 393-0 (unanimous)
  • Deadline: by 17 March 2016 for the State Department to recognise
  • State Dept.: Sec. John Kerry stated formally on 17 March 2016: “Daesh is responsible for genocide against groups in areas under its control, including Yazidis, Christians and Shia Muslims.”
  • URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2016-03-14/html/CREC-2016-03-14-pt1-PgH1314.htm
  • Trust: 10

4.4 UK: 20 April 2016 (House of Commons)

4.5 Canada: 25 October 2016 (House of Commons)

4.6 France: 6 December 2016 (Senate) / 8 December 2016 (Assemblée nationale)

4.7 Council of Europe (PACE): 12 October 2017

4.8 Scotland: Holyrood Motion S5M-04130 (2017)

4.9 Australia: 26 February 2018 (House of Representatives)

  • Initiator: Chris Crewther (Liberal)
  • Multi-party support; both the House of Representatives and the Senate passed motions
  • Trust: 9

4.10 Israel/Knesset: REJECTED 21 November 2018

4.11 Netherlands: 6 July 2021 (Tweede Kamer)

4.12 Belgium: 30 June 2021 / July 2021 full vote

  • 30 June 2021: Foreign Affairs Committee recognises genocide
  • 15 July 2021: plenum unanimously (139-0, all members present)
  • Content: recognition + obligation to prosecute
  • URL: https://www.rudaw.net/english/world/15072021
  • Trust: 9

4.13 Germany: 19 January 2023 (Bundestag)

4.14 UK formal government recognition: August 2023

  • Foreign Secretary James Cleverly formally declared ISIS acts as genocide (see 4.4)

4.15 Switzerland: 17 December 2024 (National Council)

4.16 Portugal: 2024 (Parliament)


5. Daesh tribunals (universal jurisdiction & national criminal proceedings)

5.1 Frankfurt OLG: Taha Al-J. (30 November 2021)

5.2 Munich OLG: Jennifer Wenisch (25 October 2021)

5.3 Koblenz OLG: Nadine K. (May 2022 / conviction June 2023)

5.4 The Hague: Hasna A. (December 2024 / appeal February 2026)

5.5 Stockholm: Lina Ishaq (February 2025 / appeal November 2025)

5.6 Brussels: Sammy Djedou (13 November 2025)

5.7 Lisbon: Ameen brothers (18 January 2024)

5.8 Overview table of tribunals

Date Court Defendant(s) Verdict Significance
30.11.2021 Frankfurt OLG Taha Al-J. Life + €50k 1st genocide verdict worldwide
25.10.2021 Munich OLG Jennifer Wenisch 10 yrs 1st DE Daesh woman convicted of crimes against Yazidis
24.05.2022 Koblenz OLG (verdict 22.06.2023) Nadine K. 9 yrs 3 mos 3rd genocide verdict worldwide
18.01.2024 Lisbon Ameen brothers 10 + 16 yrs PT 1st war-crimes verdict
11.02.2025 Stockholm Lina Ishaq (1st inst.) 12 yrs 1st SE genocide verdict; forced transfer of children
11.12.2024 The Hague Hasna A. (1st inst.) (crimes against humanity) 1st NL Yazidi verdict
11.11.2025 Stockholm Hovrätt Lina Ishaq (appeal) 12 yrs (confirmed) Consolidation of precedent
13.11.2025 Brussels Sammy Djedou (in absentia) Genocide 1st BE verdict; 1st EU man
25.03.2026 The Hague appeal Hasna A. 9 yrs Confirmation of NL precedent

6. Iraqi Yazidi Survivors Law

6.1 Adoption

  • Date: 1 March 2021 (Iraqi Council of Representatives)
  • Official name: “Yazidi [Female] Survivors Law” (translation inconsistent)
  • Extension: also Christian, Shabak and Turkmen women from Daesh captivity

6.2 Recognised survivor categories

  1. Êzîdî, Christian, Shabak, Turkmen women taken captive by Daesh
  2. Children (under 18 at abduction) who survived Daesh captivity
  3. Survivors of mass killings in genocide-affected areas

6.3 Reparation benefits

  • Monthly stipends (~at least an Iraqi civil-service minimum salary)
  • Medical and psychological care
  • Housing: entitlement to a residential plot
  • Education: right without age limit
  • Preference in public service

6.4 Implementation status (as of 2024)

  • 1,651 survivors with reparation entitlement confirmed (early 2024)
  • 847 female survivors
  • 784 children (under 18 at abduction)
  • 20 survivors of massacres
  • As of 2025: more than 2,300 women and girls receive monthly stipends
  • 260+ Êzîdî and Turkmen families received residential plots

6.5 Implementation problems

  • Additional requirement: criminal complaint as a precondition, psychologically retraumatising
  • Bureaucratic hurdles (registration, documentation)
  • Infrastructure gaps in conflict areas
  • HRW & Free Yezidi Foundation criticise “flawed implementation”

Sources (Trust 10):


7. UN actions

7.1 UNITAD (Investigative Team to Promote Accountability for Crimes Committed by Da’esh/ISIL)

  • Founded: UN Security Council Resolution 2379 (2017), on 21 September 2017
  • First Special Adviser: Karim Asad Ahmad Khan (UK, now ICC chief prosecutor)
  • Mandate: collection, preservation and storage of evidence of Daesh crimes in Iraq, transfer to Iraqi and other judicial authorities
  • Key reports:
  • 2021: detailed genocide finding against Êzîdîs
  • 2022–2023: Sexual & Gender-Based Violence Reports
  • Mass-grave analyses (Kocho and others)

7.2 End of mandate: 17 September 2024 (critical gap!)

  • Resolution 2697 (2023) extended the mandate only until 17 Sept 2024 (“only”)
  • Iraq had voiced reservations against UNITAD renewal for the first time in 2023
  • UNITAD no longer operational from 18 Sept 2024
  • Archive: handed over to UN HQ, hope for future accessibility
  • Handover to Iraq: SC resolution called for an SG report for implementation options
  • Statement Nadia Murad + Amal Clooney: criticism of the “abrupt end” of the only UN-specific Êzîdî investigation structure

Sources (Trust 10):

7.3 UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues

  • Current: Prof. Nicolas Levrat (Switzerland), since 1 November 2023
  • Predecessor: Fernand de Varennes (until Oct 2023)
  • 2025 visit: planned 15–23 June 2025 (Baghdad, Erbil, Dohuk, Sinjar, Mosul), postponed due to closure of Iraqi airspace and the security situation
  • 2016 report (Rita Izsák-Ndiaye): first comprehensive UN documentation; A/HRC/34/53/Add.1

Source (Trust 9):

7.4 UN resolutions

  • SC Res. 2379 (2017): creation of UNITAD
  • SC Res. 2697 (2023): end of UNITAD mandate
  • HRC Res. 52/5 (2023): promotion of visits by the Minorities Rapporteur to Iraq
  • UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria (June 2016): “They came to destroy”, first UN finding that the ISIS crimes constitute genocide

8. Return policy

8.1 Sinjar return statistics (2014 → 2026)

Date Displaced In camps Returned Missing
August 2014 ~350,000–450,000 (acute flight) 0 ~6,500 abducted
2017–2018 ~360,000 ~300,000 ~50,000 ~3,000
2022 ~200,000 ~200,000 ~150,000 ~2,700
As of 2024–2025 ~200,000 displaced 150,000+ in camps 130,000–150,000 2,558+

Sinjar District return rate: 43%, the second lowest rate of any district in Iraq.

8.2 KRG statements

  • KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani and President Nechirvan Barzani repeatedly pledge support
  • The KRG criticises non-implementation of the Sinjar Agreement as an obstacle to return
  • Vian Dakhil and Khairy Bozani call for pressure on Baghdad

8.3 Iraqi incentives (since January 2024)

  • One-off payment: 4 million Iraqi dinars (~3,000 USD) per family
  • Preferential access to state jobs
  • Social insurance
  • Zero-interest microloans for small businesses
  • Success: between 130,000–150,000 Êzîdîs have returned since January 2024
  • November 2024: ~900 Êzîdîs returned from Dohuk camps

8.4 German federalism split on deportations

Pro-deportation (or without halt):

  • Bavaria (CSU): active deportations, Adlkofen family deported Oct 2024
  • Hesse (CDU-led 2024): deportations
  • Saxony, Brandenburg: deportations
  • Example case: Qassim family from Brandenburg, 22 July 2025 deportation Leipzig → Baghdad (4 children aged between 5 and 17)

Deportation halts:

  • Lower Saxony (SPD-Greens): deportation halt for Êzîdîs 2023
  • North Rhine-Westphalia (CDU-Greens): deportation halt
  • Thuringia (Linke-SPD-Greens): deportation halt
  • Schleswig-Holstein (CDU-Greens): deportation halt

Federal statistics:

  • 2020: 27 deportations to Iraq
  • 2024: 699 deportations to Iraq
  • January 2024 – June 2025: more than 1,000 Iraqis deported, among them many Êzîdîs

Legislative attempts:

  • The Greens submitted a draft law for a Êzîdî right to remain → no majority in the Bundestag

Sources (Trust 9):


9. Political divisions within the Êzîdî community

9.1 KDP vs PKK/YBŞ loyalty in Sinjar

Dimension: political-military, with ethno-national dimension (Kurdistan ties vs autonomous Êzîdî status)

  • KDP-oriented Êzîdîs:

  • See Êzîdîs as Kurds

  • Accept KRG authority, Mîr Hazim symbolically as a bridge

  • Linked with Peshmerga structures

  • Stronger among Dohuk IDPs, Lalish establishment

  • PKK/YBŞ-oriented Êzîdîs:

  • Criticise the KDP for “abandoning Sinjar” on 3 August 2014, Kurdish perpetrators of betrayal in Êzîdî perception

  • Armed protection by the YBŞ as what feels like the only reliable force

  • Independent Êzîdî identity (non-Kurdish or its own Êzîdî variant)

  • Stronger in Sinjar itself

  • Political movement TEV-Çand (Êzîdî, close to PKK)

Key trauma: KDP Peshmerga withdrew from Sinjar on 3 August 2014, many Êzîdîs regard this as betrayal by Kurdish perpetrators. The PKK/YPG created the corridor to Mount Sinjar that saved tens of thousands of lives.

9.2 Diaspora vs homeland position

  • Diaspora Êzîdîs (DE, AT, CH, USA, CA, AUS) ~ 200,000–300,000:

  • Push more strongly for secular reforms

  • Marriage outside the castes more common in practice

  • Politically often pro-PKK sympathies or non-partisan

  • Demands for international protection, against deportation

  • Homeland Êzîdîs (Sinjar, Şêxan, Dohuk IDPs):

  • More traditional, religiously conservative

  • The spiritual council in Lalish has more authority here

  • Caught lifelong in the tension between Baghdad, Erbil, Ankara

9.3 Religious-traditional vs secular

  • Traditional current: Lalish establishment under Baba Sheikh + Mîr; strict caste and marriage rules
  • Secular / reform current: diaspora intellectuals, some younger activists

9.4 Reform debates

Caste system (Sheikh / Pîr / Mirîd):

  • Marriage bans between castes traditionally strict
  • Reform debate: relaxation in the diaspora; in the Mirîd caste partly relaxed because of the risk of extinction
  • Taboo: marriage outside the Êzîdî religion: no conversion into Êzîdîsm is possible (traditionally)

Children from Daesh captivity (2019 debate):

  • 2019: the Êzîdî Supreme Council (Lalish) initially declared that children of Daesh perpetrators could be admitted to the Êzîdî community (3-day “Welcome” decision)
  • Three days later: reversion of the decision due to massive community protests
  • Obstacle: Iraqi civil-status law (Art. 26 of the 2015 Identity Card Act): children with a Muslim father MUST be registered as Muslim, rape is NOT foreseen as an exception
  • Hundreds of Êzîdî women with children from Daesh captivity → conflict between mother and community

Re-admission of enslaved women:

  • Mîr Tahsîn Saîd Beg + Baba Sheikh Khurto Hajji Ismail issued a historic fatwa in 2014/2015: raped Êzîdî women are not regarded as impure and shall be fully re-admitted: “re-baptism” ceremony in Lalish, regarded as a religious break with centuries of tradition

Sources (Trust 8–9):


Source list appendix (rating)

Highest trust (10/10)

  • UN OHCHR, UN press releases, UNITAD original pages
  • Bundestag documents
  • Swiss Parliament parlament.ch
  • EUR-Lex, European Parliament (official document servers)
  • National court verdicts (Frankfurt, Munich, Koblenz OLG)
  • Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch
  • Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor

High trust (8–9/10)

  • Al Jazeera, Reuters, AP, France 24, BBC, NPR
  • Atlantic Council, International Crisis Group, Chatham House
  • Yazda, Free Yezidi Foundation, Nadia’s Initiative (Êzîdî NGOs, primary)
  • Kurdistan24, Rudaw, KirkukNow, The New Region (regional sources)
  • Wikipedia (cross-validated)

Medium (6–7/10)

  • Encyclopaedia Iranica (academic, but partly older)
  • Britannica (good base, may miss politically sensitive details)
  • Blogs of specialist academics

Caution / for reference only (4–5/10)

  • ANF News (close to PKK, ideologically coloured)
  • Tehran Times (Iranian state perspective)
  • Individual tweets without secondary confirmation

See also: [Genocides worldwide] (in-depth recognition and tribunal analysis), [Sacred genealogy] (Mîr office and religious offices), [Notable Êzîdî figures].

4.8b Armenia: 16 January 2018 (National Assembly)

10. Diaspora Advocacy Organizations

The international recognition of the genocide, the UN investigations (UNITAD), the reparations legislation in Iraq, and the universal-jurisdiction proceedings in Europe would scarcely have been conceivable without years of lobbying and documentation work by Yazidi diaspora organizations. They are secular civil-society actors (NOT religious institutions like the Mîr office or the Spiritual Council in Lalîş) and act as co-plaintiffs, evidence collectors, lawyers, and political lobbyists.

10.1 Yazda – Global Yazidi Organization

  • Founded: August 2014 (immediately after the start of the IS genocide), led by Yazidi-American activists in Lincoln (Nebraska) and Houston (Texas)
  • Co-founders: among others Murad Ismael, Haidar Elias, Hadi Pir, Khairi Darweesh, Laila Khoudeida, Rasheed Murad, Abid Shamdeen, Ajaweed Badeel
  • Legal form/headquarters: US-based NGO with field work in northern Iraq (Sinjar, Nineveh Plains) and northeastern Syria
  • Core work:
  • Genocide Documentation Project: Mapping and securing evidence of mass graves. A Yazda report from January 2016 located 35 mass graves and killing sites; a follow-up report in August 2018 (after the liberation of Koço) called for the acceleration of the UNITAD-supported exhumations.
  • Support for victim testimonies and co-plaintiff status in the European criminal proceedings (see Section 5; Yazda accompanied, among others, the proceedings in The Hague and Brussels)
  • International advocacy for genocide recognition (among others Portugal 2024, see 4.16)
  • Connection to Nadia Murad: Yazda helped Nadia Murad and her lawyer Amal Clooney to bring the case before the UN and to build pressure on the Iraqi government.
  • Sources (Trust 8-9):
  • Wikipedia “Yazda”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazda
  • Yazda, “Documenting Mass Graves of the Yazidis Killed by the Islamic State”: https://www.yazda.org/publications/documenting-mass-graves-of-the-yazidis-killed-by-the-islamic-state

10.2 Nadia’s Initiative

  • Founded: January 2018 by Nadia Murad (Nobel Peace Prize 2018, jointly with Denis Mukwege; herself a survivor of the Kocho massacre)
  • Headquarters: Washington, D.C., with a field office in Sinjar
  • Self-image: “survivor-led”
  • Mission: Reconstruction of destroyed communities in Sinjar (health, education, water, livelihoods, women’s empowerment) as well as advocacy for survivors of sexual violence
  • Political role: Nadia’s Initiative has repeatedly come forward with political statements – among others jointly with Amal Clooney criticizing the abrupt end of the UNITAD mandate (September 2024, see 7.2) and against the deportation of Yazidi families from Germany (July 2025, see 8.4).
  • Sources (Trust 8-9):
  • Wikipedia “Nadia’s Initiative”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadia’s_Initiative
  • Nadia’s Initiative: https://www.nadiasinitiative.org/nadias-initiative

10.3 Free Yezidi Foundation (FYF)

  • Founded: August 2014 (registered as “Stichting Free Yezidi” in the Netherlands) by Pari Ibrahim, who fled from Iraq to the Netherlands as a child in 1991
  • Headquarters: Main offices in the USA and the Netherlands; field work in Dohuk (Kurdistan Region of Iraq)
  • Profile: Non-partisan, women-led; focus on trauma therapy, economic self-sufficiency, and the rights of women and minorities
  • Political role: FYF is among the most prominent critics of the deficient implementation of the Iraqi Yazidi Survivors Law (see 6.5) and published a detailed annual report on the matter.
  • Sources (Trust 8-9):
  • Free Yezidi Foundation: https://freeyezidi.org/
  • FYF Survivors-Law-Report: https://freeyezidi.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Iraqs-Yezidi-Survivors-Law-Report-on-Year-One-of-Reparation-FYF.pdf

10.4 Yazidi Umbrella Associations in Germany (NÊ / ZÊD)

With over 230,000 Yazidis, Germany is home to the largest Yazidi diaspora worldwide; the local associations are correspondingly important for parliamentary recognition (Bundestag 2023, see 4.13).

  • Central Council of Êzîden in Germany (ZÊD): founded on 29 January 2017 in Bielefeld (registered office in Lollar), the umbrella association of Yazidi organizations in Germany. It emerged from two predecessor umbrella associations: the Central Council of Yezidis in Germany (ZYD), founded in 2007 in Oldenburg, and the Ezidî Central Council in Germany (EZiD), founded in 2008. The ZÊD entered into a partnership with Yazda.
  • Êzîdî/Yezidi Forum Oldenburg: founded in 2007 in Oldenburg; it dissolved after the founding of the ZÊD, and the member associations continue their work within the ZÊD bodies.
  • Note on the designation: The abbreviation “NÊ” mentioned in the gap is sometimes used in the diaspora synonymously for Yazidi federation/umbrella structures; the established and verifiable nationwide umbrella association today is the ZÊD.
  • Sources (Trust 7-8):
  • Wikipedia “Zentralrat der Êzîden in Deutschland”: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zentralrat_der_Êzîden_in_Deutschland
  • Yeziden.de (Yezidisches Forum Oldenburg): https://www.yeziden.de/
  • Yazda/ZÊD partnership: https://www.yazda.org/zed-and-yazda-are-pleased-to-announce-they-have-entered-into-a-partnership

Related content

Kommentare

Noch keine Kommentare — sei der Erste.